Dec 20, 2011

New title for food inspectors

The new Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, has re-designated all existing full-time food inspectors in the state as Food Safety Officers. The new entrants to the post requires an MSc in chemistry or food technology.
Dr Sudhakar Rao, joint food controller, Institute of Preventive Medicine, said, “We have 54 food inspectors in the state, including six inspectors from the GHMC. As per the new regulations, they have been notified as FSOs. Most of them hold an MSc degree. The new entrants too are required to possess an MSc in chemistry or food technology as the basic qualification. The responsibilities of the FSOs remain same as food inspectors, such as collecting samples inspecting eateries and food manufacturing units.”
The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1956 has been repealed and replaced with FSS Act from this month.
The Act aims to bring a paradigm shift in the method of licencing, disposal of pending cases, role of private laboratories, food labeling, introduction of uniform laws, deemed licencing for the first time and so on.

State Safety Commissionerate understaffed?

Short of 130 Food Safety Officers (FSOs), the State Food Safety Commissionerate is finding it difficult to enforce the Food Safety and Standards Rules, 2011. Karnataka requires 234 Food Safety Officers, but the state has managed to train only 104 officers.
Speaking to Express B S Rama Prasad, State Food Safety commissioner, says the appointment of FSOs is not an easy procedure.
“It is easy to say these vacancies have to be filled. But the work is technical and we need officers who are specially trained under the new Act. No ordinary training will suffice,” he explained. He added that the commissionerate needed to re-designate, retrain and re-orient existing officers. Despite that, there is still a shortage of officers.
“We have forwarded our proposal to the state government for the appointment of an independent cadre. We have framed the cadre requirement rules as well,” he added. The rules specify that to be an FSO, one needs to have a degree in ‘Food Technology/Dairy, Technology/Biotechnology/Oil Technology /Agricultural Sciences or Veterinary Sciences, and must be trained by the Food Authority in a recognised institute approved for the purpose (as per the Rules).
Due to the shortage, existing officers are forced to handle a vast area making it difficult to enforce the provisions of the Act. Additionally, the officers also lack sufficient awareness and education about the new Act. Dr Srinivasa Gowda, Joint Director of Public Health Institute, Government of Karnataka, said that even in the category of designated officers, some officers in the state lack training.
“Out of 30 designated Ooficers, 19 have been trained. The remaining 11 will have to be trained by the ones who have already received training,” he explained.
Since the Act and its rules have come into force only in August 2011, officials believe that the commissionerate will be able to consolidate itself soon. “The proposal for appointment is with the state government. We expect a reply soon,” said Gowda. Replacing the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, The Food Safety and Standards Act (FSSA) came into force on August 5, 2011.
According to these rules, a food safety team is appointed in each state.

Hitches hamper functioning of food safety officers



Though tempting, roadside eateries can cause stomach ailments. Photo:K.Ananthan
Though tempting, roadside eateries can cause stomach ailments 
Transition period problems are being overcome: officials

Too many hitches seem to hamper the functioning of food safety officers (FSO).
Delay in issue of a GO bringing them under the Department of Public Health and Family Welfare has prevented the 500-odd food safety officers from receiving their first month's salary till date.
Repealing the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, the Food Safety and Standards Act of 2006 was brought in creating the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. Food safety officers come under the Food Safety Commissionerate.
The State, which implemented the new system, brought in 385 FSOs for rural areas, 148 for urban areas, besides 30-odd in reserve.
Sanitary inspectors in local bodies were designated as food safety officers.
The first hitch the FSOs now faced was that they have not received their first month's salary.
Enquiries revealed that tallying of pay particulars and creation of a separate code and head of account for the treasury to disburse the salary had led to the delay.
Sources also clarified that the disbursement of salaries for the FSOs would take place within the next three to four working days.
Going by the number of trades listed and merchants existing, Tamil Nadu is the only State to have gone in for creation of more than 500 FSO posts, so that the objective of food safety could be achieved preventing adulteration by frequent inspections. However, the FSOs initially faced a problem of not having any National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration of Laboratories (NABL) accredited laboratory. The FSOs need to lift food samples in the event of a suspicion of adulteration. The samples need to be sent to a laboratory.
Food Safety and Standards Act stipulates that testing of food samples done only by laboratories which have the certification by the NABL.
There are six laboratories in Tamil Nadu at Coimbatore, Madurai, Thanjavur, Pudukottai and two at Chennai. However, the Government notified that the samples could be tested at the existing laboratories and a GO has already been issued and one-year transition time is given enabling the utilisation of the existing laboratories.
These laboratories have already commenced the process for NABL certification.
Sources also pointed out that making sanitary inspectors as food safety officers and bringing them under Department of Food and Drug Control under the Public Health and Family Welfare was in contravention to the constitutional provision. Sources said that Article 243 (w) of the Constitution and XIIth schedule says that Food Safety under Public Health is the power and responsibility of the local self governments i.e., local bodies.
Officials disputing the contention said that almost all the States excepting in only one local body in Gujarat, the food safety has come under the purview of the Government relieving the local bodies of that responsibility.
The objective of taking away food safety from the local bodies to a separate department was to ensure undivided attention on the department.
If the FSOs continued with the local bodies, the chances of they being frequently drafted for other pressing works of the local body was more, thus defeating the objective of food safety.

Experts stress on strict enforcement of food safety measures at workshop


To educate food regulators on the importance of hygienic and safe food for consumers in India, a one-day workshop on the benefits of food safety was held in Bangalore recently.

The workshop, Food Safety – The Way Forward, stressed on ensuring safe and wholesome food to consumers and saw eminent scientists, regulators, and legal experts brainstorm on how to eliminate risks and prevent food-related health hazards. The workshop was jointly organised by the Nestle Nutrition Institute and State Food Authority at The Chancery Pavilion in Bangalore.

“The safety aspects of food should be more of an education awareness programme and an important strategy to educate the regulators on the practical aspects of food safety,” said Dr Prathap Kumar Shetty, reader & head, department of food science and technology, Pondicherry University.

“New food regulation (FSSA) emphasises heavily on the science-based approach besides the importance of educating food regulators and people on food safety,” he said.

The workshop was held to benefit the food safety officers of Karnataka about the pertinence of implementing food safety measures. Food safety officers are the sole authority for registration and are the initial contact for the food business operators. They ensure necessary precautions are taken at the appropriate time and varied stages of food from the farm to the consumer.

In fact, to ensure necessary safeguards for public health and prevent potential hazards, the government implemented the Food Safety and Standards Act 2006, Rules and Regulations 2011.

It is the final authority to regulate the manufacture, processing, storage, distribution, sale and import of food articles through the Food Safety Authority by implementing the scientific standards. It gives adequate information to the consumer to make his own choices. The function was inaugurated by B S Rama Prasad, state food safety commissioner, Government of Karnataka.

Speaking on the occasion, Dr Anandavally, FAO/WHO consultant said, “FSOs should focus on the controls implemented by the FBOs to prevent food-borne diseases and high risk foods and avail the resources available to protect public health. There is an element of risk involved with food and the risk control parameters include food from unsafe sources, inadequate cooking, improper temperature maintenance, cross contamination, contaminated equipments, poor personal hygiene, health status of food-handlers, poor quality of water, lack of pest management and TCS system.

“The inspection will stress on these so that the food business operators are well informed about the controls which ensure food-borne diseases are controlled. This will better communication between the regulators and FBOs and help protect consumers and promote the trade of safe foods,'' she felt.

Dr Ashok R Patil, associate professor in law & chair on consumer law & practice
(ministry of consumer affairs, Government of India), stressed on Community Health as National Wealth. He added, “Food is one of the basic necessities for sustenance of life. It is no wonder to say that community health is national wealth. Public health can be improved only by raising the level of nutrition.” Stringent rules have to be in place to bring about the prohibition and consumption of intoxicating drinks and drugs which are injurious to health. The Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, which came into force from August 5, 2011, by repealing the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, imposes special responsibilities for manufacturers, distributors and sellers on food safety.

New Act imposes special responsibilities for manufacturers, distributors and sellers on food safety. Stringent punishments are prescribed to reduce the offences under this Act and also it helps to avoid exploitation of consumer. Enforcement authorities have got more powers to control the menace at different levels of food chain. Because of establishment of Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, Food Safety Appellate Tribunal & Special Courts and appointment of Adjudicating Officer, Public Prosecutors for speedy justice. On conviction the court may publish the offenders name, address, offences and penalties in the newspaper with the offender’s expense. The object of the new law will be successful only if enforcement machinery uses all powers given under this Act.

Food inspectors are the real backbone as far as the regulation and implementation of food safety standards is concerned. They know the practical aspects while investigating food illness including food poisoning from the field perspective. Food inspectors with scientific knowledge of food-borne diseases play a vital role in the documentation of these cases and scientifically develop strategies for the prevention and control of food poisoning which happens at the community level.

Food-borne disease outbreaks involving agents such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella and chemical contaminants highlight problems with food safety and increase public anxiety. Modern farming systems, food processing and marketing do not provide adequate safeguards for public health.

“Factors like improper agricultural practices; poor hygiene at all stages of the food chain; lack of preventive controls in food processing; misuse of food additives in processed foods, etc., largely contribute to food-related hazards,” said Dr M N Krishnamurthy, former director, central food laboratory, CFTRI, Mysore.

“Consumers expect protection from hazards occurring along the entire food chain. It is the foremost responsibility of food laws regulatory agency to enforce food laws to protect the consumer against unsafe, impure and fraudulently presented food. Among other things, this can be achieved by prohibiting the sale of food not of the nature, substance or quality demanded by the purchaser,” he added.

The function was attended by Dr Krishnamurthy; S B Dongre, director, FSSAI, New Delhi; Dr Anandavally; Ashok Patil; Dr Prathap Kumar Shetty; and Dr Srinivasa Gowda, joint director, Public Health Institute, Government of Karnataka.

Hailing Nestle Nutrition Institute’s efforts to draw attention towards food safety, the speakers stressed on the importance of mobilising opinion on the issue. Identifying priority areas and making specific interventions, they said, is the way forward.