Sep 14, 2015

Meet on processed foods: Suvrathan wants industry to adopt self regulation

Mumbai
For past few months there has a been complex scenario for the food processing industry as there are several changes taking place with regard to Product Approval and food safety aspects in regulations. To understand these regulatory changes, know the problems that are existing and seek possible solutions, Protein Foods and Nutrition Development Association of India (PFNDAI) had organised a one-day seminar on 'Safety of Processed Food Products' here on Friday.
The event started with the welcome address by Bhupinder Singh, chairman, PFNDAI, & CEO, Vista Processed Foods, who hoped for a fruitful interaction on food safety wherein scientists and FBOs come together and share their experience and knowledge.
The inaugural address was by Dr P I Suvrathan, former chairperson, FSSAI. He discussed issues on regulations.
Suvrathan initiated the session by stating, "There is no going back to old PFA Act but to move ahead discussing experiences, putting forth challenges and looking at possible solutions to be brought in current regulations. Currently as per the Act, the primary burden of food safety is on producers. It is they who should ensure providing safe food to consumers."
Talking about issues, he added, "Regulators seems to be hesitant to hire private sector scientists whereas they should be given opportunity to put forth industry issues. Though scientists should help to provide draft of food safety, the risk assessment and inspection should be solely done by regulators based on available law and not on saying of scientific panel."
"The important point that is missed by regulators is safety aspect with regard to unorganised food sector which contributes almost 90% of food sector. The food sold on street and mid-day school meals should be safe. Asian countries like Thailand, Malaysia, and Sri Lanka have tackled food safety of the unorganised sector effectively, then why not India," he asked.
Suggesting to make regulations simpler, Suvrathan said, "Self regulation initiative should be taken into consideration by various associations like Bakery Association in Kerala. Wherein the association itself has drafted the law, taken approval from the Centre and abiding by it."
In his keynote address on 'How to Provide Safe Processed Foods,' Dr Vilas Sinkar, ex-VP, R&D, Unilever, stated, "Food industry is the largest industry in India contributing majority to country's GDP and providing largest employment in the country. The sector can expand its potential in having farm extension programme, better organised supply chain, good investment in agriculture & R&D in food, simple regulation with transparency, skilled manpower, and PPP."
From toxicology point of view, he said, “Food safety can be tackled by analysing the chemicals present in product. Regulators should take a risk-based approach wherein a hazard is identified beforehand for consumer safety. The novel ingredients should be evaluated in scientific robust way."
The Session 1 was focussed on the topic 'Safety of Foods & Supplements.' The session started with Ganesh Kamath, director, Vital Nutraceuticals, focussing on regulatory aspect, he said, " It is Central government, which has power to prohibit or approve new product. Also the approval should be made by visiting a manufacturing plant, inspecting manufacturing process, the ingredients used, from where they are procured and upto how much limit is put into use."
Dr Madhavan Nair, head, micronutrients res., NIN, Hyderabad, threw light on Nutrients: Concept of RDA, UTL & NOAEL. He said, "Safety of food can be taken by researching on different essential nutrients present in the product. While analysing optimal nutrients required by body, health, saturation of tissue of the body should be understood."
"For botanicals, safety assessment is done on basis of available knowledge and information. Process of manufacturing, extraction of raw material, safety of any toxicity, pesticide should be inspected for safety of botanicals,” stated K Bala Subramanian, head, technical, Chennai Mettexlab. He spoke on Analysis & Evaluation of Safety of Botanicals.
"Analyticals challenges faced by botanical-based product manufacturer are that reference materials are hard to find, testing method and validation is limited and good compendium on botanicals is required," added Subramanian.
Session 2 talks were based on 'Safety of Food & Food Ingredients.'
Dr J I Lewis, consultant, FSSAI, said, "Inspection system is virtually impossible with large industry and limited manpower. Also food safety is concept for not just end-product but the whole manufacturing process."
The other speakers for the session were Dr Nimish Shah, director, safety and environment assurance centre, HUL, and Niraj Raje, sr food assessor, LRQA.
The topic for Session 3 was Safety of Additives and the seminar concluded with a panel discussion on Enforcement, Sampling, Analysis and so on.
Few of the key points from the event would be sent as recommendations to FSSAI towards ensuring smoother food regulations for India.

DINAMALAR NEWS


DINAMALAR NEWS


DINAMALAR NEWS



Willing to engage with FSSAI constructively: Nestle

Nestle India is due to present findings of a court-ordered re-test of Maggi samples by the end of September
The newly appointed managing director of Nestle India, Suresh Narayanan, is not only overhauling processes and systems within the country's largest food company by revenue but also appears willing to mend the firm's ties with the country's apex food regulator.
In response to a specific query on the issue, Narayanan, recently in the city, said, "The primary regulator for food quality and safety in the country is FSSAI (Food Safety & Standards Authority of India). We will engage with them constructively. It is my commitment that we will do it in a professional, forward-looking manner. All I am asking for is a voice of fairness, understanding and reason. We have no ego at all about this."
FSSAI had accused Nestle India of choosing to go to court rather than engage with it, following the recall and ban of Maggi noodles in June. This bitterness was visible during the proceedings in the high court her with FSSAI repeatedly saying Nestle India breached the regulator's trust. FSSAI had also argued that Nestle India had voluntarily opted to destroy Maggi samples recalled from across the country, against the regulator's orders. This, FSSAI said, was intended to 'destroy evidence'.
In a conciliatory gesture, Narayanan said he was willing to put everything behind. "I am not in the game to belittle anyone. My aim is to seek a lasting solution to this problem. This will not only benefit us but the industry, too," he said.
Nestle India is due to present findings of a court-ordered re-test of Maggi samples by the end of September. The high court in its August 13 order had given the company six weeks to do so. The re-test is being conducted at three NABL-accredited laboratories, located at Mohali in Punjab, Jaipur and Hyderabad.
Narayanan says there are two parts to this exercise. One is the results of the tests. If cleared in this round, the firm will be permitted to manufacture Maggi noodles.
Once this is done, it will have to go through a second round of testing of the manufactured samples, to check for quality and safety. If the firm passes this, it can re-launch the product.
Predictably, the firm is working on a year-end re-launch of Maggi and is expected to use all levers to ensure it is what Narayanan describes as a "memorable" experience.
Narayanan said the company had not thought about appointing brand ambassadors to endorse Maggi during and after the re-launch.